Confessions By Saul M. Kassin 1471 Words6 Pages 1.False Confessions by Saul M. Kassin Within the criminal forensic field, there has been a shift in research dealing with DNA exoneration and placing guilt of a crime on the legitimate perpetrator.
Dr. Kassin is Past President of Division 41 of APA (The American Psychology-Law Society). He is also a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) and Association for Psychological Science (APS). In 2007, he received a Presidential Citation Award from APA for his work on false confessions.
Read Article →Volume 17—Number 4 251 False Confessions WHY INNOCENT CONFESSORS ARE CONVICTED When a suspect retracts his or her confession, pleads not guilty, and goes to trial, a sequence of two courtroom decisions is set into motion. First, a judge determines whether the confession was voluntary and admissible as evidence.
Read Article →False Confessions Causes, Consequences, and Implications for Reform Saul M. Kassin John Jay College of Criminal Justice ABSTRACT—Despite the commonsense belief that people do not confess to crimes they did not commit, 20 to 25% of all DNA exonerations involve innocent prisoners who confessed.
Read Article →Saul M. Kassin John Jay College of Criminal Justice Inspired by DNA exoneration cases and other wrongful convictions of innocent people who had confessed to crimes they did not commit, and drawing from basic principles of social perception and social influence, a vast body of research has focused on the social psychology of confessions.
Read Article →In the 1980's, Kassin pioneered the scientific study of false confessions by introducing a taxonomy that distinguished between three types of false confessions (voluntary, compliant, and internalized) that is universally accepted today and by devising laboratory paradigms that enable tests of why innocent people are targeted for interrogation and why they confess.
Awarded a Distinguished Lifetime contribution Awards by the American Psychology-Law Society and and APA presidential citation for his research on false confessions, Dr. Kassin's work is cited all over the world—including by the U.S. Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of Canada.
The Social Psychology of False Confessions. Saul M. Kassin. Corresponding Author. John Jay College of Criminal Justice. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to S. Kassin, Department of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, 524 West 59 Street, New York, NY 10019.
In this episode we speak with a psychologist about how law enforcement, current policies and our own sense of justice can lead to false confessions. I’m Audrey Hamilton and this is Speaking of Psychology. Saul Kassin is a distinguished professor of psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
False Confessions. Compiled by Amelia Hritz, Michal Blau, and Sara Tomezsko. LEGAL ISSUE Police-induced false confessions are among the leading causes of wrongful convictions. 1 There are two doctrines in criminal law designed to keep illegally obtained confessions from the jury. The first is the Miranda warnings designed to establish procedural safeguards to protect a suspect from unknowingly.
Read Article →We use cookies to offer you a better experience, personalize content, tailor advertising, provide social media features, and better understand the use of our services.
Read Article →Why Confessions Trump Innocence Saul M. Kassin John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York As illustrated by the story of Amanda Knox and many others wrongfully convicted, false confessions often trump factual innocence. Focusing on consequences, recent re-search suggests that confessions are powerfully persuasive.
Read Article →Despite the potency of confession evidence in criminal law, recent DNA exonerations indicate that false confessions are a contributing factor in numerous wrongful convictions. After distinguishing between voluntary, compliant, and internalized false confessions, this article reviews research implicating a sequence of three processes responsible for false confessions and the adverse.
Read Article →Saul M. Kassin. Corresponding Author. E-mail address:. DNA exonerations of innocent individuals have cast a spotlight on the counterintuitive problem of false confessions. Studying the underlying psychology scientists have found that (1). presentations of false evidence.
Although he has published research in the social psychology of attribution theory, jury decision-making, and eyewitness testimony, Kassin is best known for his groundbreaking work on false confessions. In 2007, he received a Presidential Award from the APA for this research.